Skip to content

Heart Wellness · Cardiovascular Therapy

Unsure About a Parent’s Heart Treatment? When Can a Second Opinion Help?

Indonesian edition reviewed bydr. Emanoel Oepangat, Sp.JP(K), Cardiology and Vascular Medicine
Review date
Reading timeAbout 18 min

Start with the explanation, then move on to practical steps. Use the contents list to choose the parts you need.

Article contents

Quick answer

Choosing the right heart treatment starts with understanding the diagnosis, the goal of the procedure, the urgency, benefits, risks, alternatives, and the consequences if the procedure is not done yet. If important questions remain unanswered, a second opinion can help patients and families gain an additional perspective before making a decision, as long as the condition does not require immediate emergency treatment.

See sources

When your father or mother is diagnosed with heart disease and the doctor starts talking about stent placement, surgery, ablation, or another procedure, families often immediately start looking for how to choose the right heart treatment. The question is not only, “What procedure needs to be done?”, but also, “Why is this procedure needed, how urgent is it, what are the benefits and risks, and are there other options?”

A situation like this can feel overwhelming. In a short time, you may have to understand unfamiliar medical terms, read test results, talk things over with family members, and at the same time help your parent decide on the next step.

However, a good treatment decision is not about finding a single procedure that is always the “most correct” one. What matters more is understanding the reasons behind the doctor’s recommendation and how that option fits the patient’s condition, needs, and priorities.

This approach is known as shared decision-making. The American Heart Association (AHA) explains that patients and healthcare professionals work together to choose tests, therapies, or care plans by considering the medical evidence along with the patient’s values, needs, and preferences. In cardiovascular care, the family can also be involved according to the patient’s wishes and condition.

In Indonesia, the patient’s right to receive an explanation before giving consent for a procedure also has a legal basis. Article 293 of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health states that consent is given after the patient has received an adequate explanation. This explanation covers at least the diagnosis, the indication, the procedure to be performed and its purpose, the risks and complications, the alternatives and their risks, the risks if the procedure is not performed, and the prognosis after the procedure.

So you do not need to be a heart expert to help your family make an informed decision. Start by making sure the most important questions have been answered clearly enough.

If parts of the discussion are still unclear afterward, a second opinion, meaning another doctor’s medical opinion, can be one option. The goal is not to find out who is wrong, but to gain an additional perspective before making an important decision. The Indonesian Ministry of Health (Kemenkes) also explains that patients and families may seek the opinion of another doctor as part of the decision-making process.

Why the Decision Feels Difficult

Heart treatment decisions can feel difficult because the family has to process a lot of medical information at once while facing the consequences of an important decision.

A Lot of Information Comes at Once

In a single consultation, the family may receive explanations about the diagnosis, ECG, echocardiography, CT, angiography, medications, procedural risks, the procedure schedule, and even aftercare.

The problem is not simply that the family “does not understand medical information well enough”. Some cardiovascular decisions genuinely require many clinical considerations. That is why shared decision-making places two-way communication as an important part of the process: the doctor explains the evidence and the relevant options, while the patient shares their questions, goals, needs, and preferences.

Unfamiliar Medical Terms

Terms such as stenosis, revascularization, PCI, ablation, ejection fraction, or prognosis may be commonly used by healthcare professionals, but they are not necessarily easy for families to understand.

You do not need to feel that you have to memorize all of them. If a term is unclear, ask what it means in the context of the patient.

For example:

“Doctor, what does this result mean for my father’s condition?”

A question like that is often more helpful than trying to understand technical definitions on their own.

The Family Feels Responsible

Adult children often take on the role of the person who takes notes, looks up information, arranges appointments, compares options, and helps explain information back to their parents.

However, as long as the condition allows, the patient should still be involved. Patient-centered care considers not only clinical data, but also the needs, values, goals, and preferences of the person receiving the care.

7 Things to Understand Before Deciding

Before choosing a procedure, make sure the family understands seven basic things: the diagnosis, the goal, the urgency, the benefits, the risks, the alternatives, and the consequences if the procedure is not done yet.

1. What Is the Underlying Diagnosis?

The first step is to understand what condition is being treated.

Ask:

  • What is the patient’s main diagnosis?
  • Which test results most strongly support the diagnosis?
  • Is the diagnosis certain enough?
  • Is there anything that still needs to be evaluated?
  • How do these findings relate to the patient’s symptoms?

A single test result rarely stands on its own. An ECG mainly assesses the heart’s electrical activity, while echocardiography, CT, angiography, or other tests answer different clinical questions.

So do not jump straight to questions about the procedure if the diagnosis itself is not yet understood.

2. What Is the Goal of Treatment?

Knowing the name of a procedure is not necessarily the same as understanding its purpose.

Ask:

  • What is the main goal of this procedure?
  • What problem is it meant to correct or control?
  • Is the goal to reduce symptoms, improve function, reduce a particular risk, or a combination of several goals?
  • How will the doctor assess whether the treatment has achieved that goal?

Two patients with the same diagnosis do not necessarily have the same treatment priorities. Overall condition, anatomy, coexisting diseases, symptoms, and the patient’s needs can influence the strategy chosen.

3. How Quickly Does the Decision Need to Be Made?

Not all heart treatment decisions have the same level of urgency.

Some conditions still allow time for discussion. However, there are also conditions in which the risk of waiting is greater, so the procedure needs to be done sooner.

Ask:

  • Does the procedure need to be done right away?
  • Why is the timing considered important?
  • Is it safe to take time for further discussion?
  • What needs to be monitored while waiting?

Do not decide on your own whether a procedure can be postponed based on information from the internet. Urgency must be assessed based on the patient’s clinical condition.

For coronary revascularization decisions, the ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline emphasizes the importance of shared decision-making. If the optimal revascularization strategy is unclear, a multidisciplinary Heart Team approach is also recommended.

4. What Benefits Are Expected?

Rather than asking, “Is this procedure good?”, ask what benefits are expected for this particular patient.

More specific questions include:

  • What is the main benefit of the procedure?
  • What problem is expected to improve?
  • Are the benefits mainly related to symptoms, function, or a particular risk?
  • How will the success of the treatment be assessed?

Medical benefits are expected outcomes, not guarantees. That is why you should avoid assuming that newer technology or a more invasive procedure is automatically better.

5. What Are the Risks and Limitations?

Understanding the risks does not mean looking for a reason to refuse a procedure. Instead, this information helps the family understand the consequences of each option more realistically.

Ask:

  1. Which risks are most relevant to the patient?
  2. Do other health conditions increase the risk?
  3. Which complications should we know about?
  4. How does the medical team work to reduce or manage the risks?

Article 293 of the Health Law also includes risks, complications, alternatives, and the risks of not performing the procedure as part of the information provided before consent is given.

So do not only ask:

“What are the risks if the procedure is done?”

Also ask:

“What are the risks if the procedure is not done?”

6. Are There Other Options?

Not every condition has several equally suitable options. However, if alternatives do exist, the patient needs to understand why one approach is recommended over another.

In general, cardiovascular care may involve medication, monitoring, catheter-based intervention, surgery, or a combination of several approaches.

For example, in coronary heart disease, the choice between stent placement and bypass surgery cannot be reduced to “which one is better?”. The complexity of the blockage, the location of the blood vessels, the clinical condition, technical feasibility, and other factors need to be considered. If the optimal revascularization strategy is unclear, the ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline recommends a Heart Team discussion.

Read also:

7. What Happens If the Procedure Has Not Been Done?

This question is often forgotten.

The family may already know the risks of the procedure, but not yet understand the consequences if the procedure is not done yet.

Ask:

  1. What could happen if we wait?
  2. Could the disease get worse?
  3. Which symptoms need to be monitored?
  4. When should the condition be reassessed?
  5. Under what circumstances should the plan be brought forward?

It is important to distinguish between waiting according to the doctor’s plan and postponing on your own without medical guidance.

At this stage, how to choose the right heart treatment is not just about comparing procedures, but about understanding the balance between the benefits, risks, alternatives, and consequences of waiting.

Questions for Your Doctor Consultation

Structured questions help the family get more useful information than bringing a long list that is not directly related to the decision.

About the Diagnosis

  • What is my parent’s main diagnosis?
  • Which test findings are the most decisive?
  • Is there anything that still needs to be evaluated?
  • What do these results mean for the patient’s current condition?

About the Treatment Plan

  • Why is this procedure recommended?
  • What is its main goal?
  • Why is this option considered more suitable?
  • Are there other relevant alternatives?

About the Benefits and Risks

  • What benefits are most expected?
  • Which risks are most important to know about?
  • Does the patient’s condition affect the benefits or risks?
  • How will the risks be monitored or managed?

About Timing

  • How quickly does a decision need to be made?
  • Is it safe to take time to discuss this?
  • What are the consequences if the procedure is postponed?
  • Which symptoms must be reported right away?

About the Next Steps

  • Are additional tests needed?
  • A doctor with which area of expertise is most relevant?
  • What needs to be prepared?
  • When is the next follow-up visit?

If Doctors’ Recommendations Differ

Different recommendations from doctors do not automatically mean that one of the doctors has made a mistake. Differences can arise because the data, the timing of the evaluation, the area of expertise, or the weighing of benefits and risks are not entirely the same.

Compare the Reasons, Not the Doctors

Rather than asking:

“Which doctor is right?”

it is more useful to compare:

  • the diagnosis used as the basis;
  • the test results used;
  • the therapeutic goals;
  • the expected benefits;
  • the risks considered;
  • the available alternatives;
  • the level of urgency.

Two doctors may arrive at different options, yet both may have sound clinical reasons.

When Is a Heart Team Relevant?

In complex cases, a decision does not always have to be made from the perspective of a single area of expertise.

For example, an interventional cardiologist can assess catheter-based treatment options, while a cardiovascular surgeon assesses whether surgery is feasible. In certain situations, both perspectives need to be discussed together.

The ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline recommends a Heart Team approach for patients being considered for revascularization when the optimal strategy is unclear.

Read more: Different Recommendations From Heart Doctors? Here Are the Steps

When a Second Opinion Helps

A second opinion can help when important questions about the diagnosis, the reasons for the procedure, the benefits, risks, alternatives, or urgency have not been answered after the previous consultation.

When the Diagnosis Is Not Yet Understood

Before looking for a second doctor, try to distinguish between two things:

  • the diagnosis is genuinely still unclear; or
  • the family has not yet understood the explanation that was given.

If the problem is communication, asking the first doctor to explain again can be an appropriate first step.

However, if meaningful uncertainty remains, an additional opinion may be considered.

When There Are Several Options

A second opinion can help explain the differences in the benefits, risks, and limitations of each option.

However, a second opinion does not ensure that a new option will emerge. Its value lies in whether the patient and family gain a more complete understanding.

When Recommendations Differ

If two doctors give different recommendations, an additional opinion can help assess the reasons behind the difference.

However, avoid continuing to look for doctors until you get the answer that most closely matches what the family wants.

The goal is not to collect the most votes.

Before a Major Medical Decision

In non-emergency situations, a second opinion may be considered when the decision involves an invasive procedure, significant risk, or several options that are not yet understood.

A second opinion is not an obligation for every patient.

The Indonesian Ministry of Health explains that patients and families may seek the opinion of another doctor to help with the decision-making process.

A second opinion also does not have to produce a different recommendation to be useful. Confirmation of the initial plan can also add value if the family ultimately understands the basis of the decision better.

What Can You Gain From a Second Opinion?

A second opinion provides an additional perspective. The result does not have to differ from the first recommendation to be useful.

Clarifying the Diagnosis

The second doctor can review the medical history, test results, and previous diagnosis to see how this information fits together.

Understanding the Reasons for a Procedure

The consultation can help answer:

  • why the procedure is being considered;
  • what the goal of therapy is;
  • what the benefits and risks are;
  • how urgent it is;
  • what happens if you wait.

Discussing Alternatives

If alternatives are indeed available, the doctor can help explain the differences.

However, not every patient has several equally suitable options.

Confirming the Initial Plan

The second opinion may well support the first recommendation.

Confirmation is still useful if the family ultimately understands why the plan is considered appropriate.

Deciding on the Next Steps

After a second opinion, the next step may be:

  • continuing with the initial plan;
  • undergoing further evaluation;
  • discussing the options again; or
  • adjusting the plan based on clinical assessment.

That is why a second opinion is not a tool for finding “a doctor who says what we want to hear”.

Key message: a second opinion does not mean the first doctor was wrong. What you are looking for is an additional perspective and a better understanding.

Preparing for a Second Opinion

Good preparation helps the doctor understand how the patient’s condition has developed without the family having to rely on memory.

Prepare Medical Records

If available, bring:

  • a medical summary or discharge letter;
  • ECG results;
  • echocardiography results;
  • cardiac CT or MRI;
  • angiography;
  • laboratory results;
  • reports of previous procedures.

The Appointment page of Heartology also directs patients to prepare their previous test results and medical records if available.

Note the Medications Being Taken

Write down the names of the medications, the doses if known, and how often they are taken.

Also share any history of surgery, hospitalization, stent placement, ablation, or other procedures that have been performed.

Do not stop or change any medication just because you are going to seek a second opinion, unless directed by a doctor.

Prioritize Your Questions

You do not need to bring dozens of questions.

Choose three to five questions that most affect the decision, for example:

  • Why is this procedure needed?
  • How urgent is it?
  • What alternatives are available?
  • Which factors most influence the choice?
  • What happens if the procedure is not done yet?

Test results from other hospitals can be brought for review. However, the doctor still determines whether the data are sufficient or whether additional tests are needed.

Choosing a Doctor for a Second Opinion

A doctor for a second opinion should be chosen based on how well their area of expertise matches the clinical problem, not on popularity alone.

Match the Expertise

For example:

  • coronary disease and revascularization options may involve interventional cardiology;
  • heart rhythm disorders may require a doctor with a focus on electrophysiology;
  • valve disease or structural heart disease has its own area of evaluation;
  • surgical decisions may require a cardiothoracic and vascular surgeon.

Heartology lists its doctors by various areas of cardiovascular expertise through its official doctor directory.

Consider Complex Cases

Some cases may require the perspective of more than one discipline.

In situations like this, a multidisciplinary approach can help bring together information from several relevant fields before a decision is made.

Patients From Out of Town

Out-of-town patients do not always have to come to Jakarta right away to start a discussion about a second opinion.

Start by Preparing Information

Before planning a trip:

  • gather medical records;
  • organize test results;
  • prepare a list of medications;
  • decide on the main questions;
  • find out which doctor’s specialty is relevant.

An Online Consultation Can Be a Starting Point

For certain non-emergency needs, an online consultation can be used to discuss the medical history and test results that are already available.

Heartology currently lists an online consultation service on its Appointment and Registration page.

However, an online consultation does not always replace an in-person examination. The doctor still determines whether the patient needs to come in or undergo additional tests.

When to Return to the Doctor

Not every doubt requires a second opinion. In many situations, asking the treating doctor to explain again is actually the most appropriate step.

If the diagnosis, the goal of the procedure, the benefits, risks, level of urgency, or other options are still not understood, schedule another discussion with the treating doctor. Also consult again if symptoms change, new symptoms appear, or the patient’s condition differs from when the previous recommendation was given.

Changes in condition can affect how the doctor assesses urgency and treatment options. So do not rely on old information if the patient’s situation has changed.

Do Not Delay in an Emergency

A second opinion must not delay treatment if the patient has signs or symptoms that point to an emergency.

The Indonesian Ministry of Health reminds the public to recognize the signs of a cardiovascular emergency and to seek help immediately if symptoms point to a heart attack or stroke. For stroke, the SeGeRa Ke RS guide (an Indonesian acronym that also means “go to the hospital right away”) includes, among others, facial asymmetry, weakness on one side of the body, slurred speech or difficulty speaking, sudden numbness, vision problems, and a severe headache that comes on suddenly.

In situations like this, the priority is immediate evaluation and treatment, not waiting for a second consultation appointment.

Helping Parents Decide

Supporting your parents means helping to organize information, not taking over the entire decision.

Simplify the Information

After the consultation, summarize the information into:

  • the diagnosis;
  • the goal of treatment;
  • the available options;
  • the benefits and risks;
  • the next steps.

There is no need to send too many articles or videos at once. Too much information can make the decision feel even more complicated.

Bring Questions, Not Conclusions

The internet is useful for preparing for a discussion, not for determining a diagnosis or therapy on your own.

Rather than saying:

“I read that bypass is definitely better.”

It is more productive to ask:

“In my father’s condition, what factors make bypass or another option more suitable?”

Listen to Your Parents’ Priorities

Ask:

  1. What do they most want to understand?
  2. What are they most worried about?
  3. Which treatment goals matter to them?
  4. Do they feel they understand their options?

Shared decision-making places the patient’s goals and preferences as an important part of medical decisions.

Align the Family’s Understanding

If family members disagree, do not immediately argue about the options.

Ask:

“What information led us to different conclusions?”

This approach helps separate medical facts, assumptions, and worries.

Steps If You Are Still Unsure

If the family is still unsure, first identify the source of the doubt. Not every doubt requires a second opinion.

If the Information Is Already Clear

If the diagnosis, goal, urgency, benefits, risks, and alternatives are already understood, continue the discussion and the plan with the doctor.

If the Explanation Is Not Yet Understood

Ask the doctor to explain again in simpler language.

You can bring notes or ask the doctor to point out the most important parts of the test results.

If You Need an Additional Perspective

Consider a second opinion if important questions remain unanswered or the decision requires a perspective from another area of expertise.

If It Is an Emergency

Do not wait.

Seek medical help immediately.

Conclusion

Helping your parents make a heart treatment decision does come with a great deal of responsibility. However, you do not have to search for answers alone or understand every medical term at once.

Start by making sure the diagnosis, the goal of the procedure, the urgency, benefits, risks, alternatives, and consequences of waiting have been explained clearly enough. If questions remain, you can ask for another explanation. If an additional perspective is truly needed, a second opinion can be one option.

Ultimately, how to choose the right heart treatment is not about finding the procedure that sounds the most sophisticated or the most famous doctor. A good decision starts from clear information, a medical assessment that fits with the patient’s condition, and a discussion that respects the patient’s needs and choices.

Keep as a reminder

Checklist before Your Consultation

Tick what you have prepared.

0 of 6 items checked

Checks are kept only while this page is open.

After reading

Discuss Your Questions with a Doctor.

Bring your notes and any test results you want to discuss. A consultation helps decide which tests and treatment are right for you.

Our team confirms the schedule and what you need for your visit. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not replace medical consultation, diagnosis, or treatment. For any health concerns, please consult a doctor directly.

Sources and Transparency.

Reviewer

Translated from the Indonesian edition medically reviewed by dr. Emanoel Oepangat, Sp.JP(K), Cardiology and Vascular Medicine on September 1, 2026.

Sources as cited in the Indonesian edition.

  1. Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Beckie TM, Allen LA, et al. (2023). Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 148(11), 912–931. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001162.
  2. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. (2022). 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 79(2), e21–e129. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006.
  3. Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan.
  4. Sista K. (2022). Bolehkah Mencari Pendapat dari Dokter Lain? Direktorat Jenderal Pelayanan Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
  5. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2023). SeGeRa Ke RS untuk Cegah Faktor Risiko Stroke.
  6. American Heart Association. Heart Attack, Stroke and Cardiac Arrest Symptoms.
  7. American Heart Association. (2021). 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization. Professional Heart Daily.

The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not replace medical consultation, diagnosis, or treatment. For any health concerns, please consult a doctor directly.

If you find information that needs clarifying, let us know through our Contact Us page.